International crimes, human rights violations, and the. Bianchi, denying state immunity to violations of human rights, 46 austrian journal of public and international law 1994 p. Greece intervening definitively draws the line under the question whether states enjoy jurisdictional immunity in cases involving allegations. State immunity is not an absolute state right under the international legal order. Greece intervening definitively draws the line under the question whether states enjoy. The aim of this thesis is to examine the question of whether there is an emerging exception in international law to the principle of foreign state immunity in respect of violations of jus cogens norms. Jurisdictional immunities of the state for serious. As international law currently stands, there are insuperable obstacles to an ideally unhampered exercise of jurisdiction and denial of immunity over human rights. Can serious human rights violations justify a breach of. They argue that fundamental human rights such as the right to life and the prohibition against torture should take precedence over rules of state immunity in technical terms, they constitute norms of jus cogens. But, it is exactly in this national sphere where the barrier known as the doctrine of sovereign state immunity arises. State immunity is an inalienable concept in international law designed to prevent abuses of interstate relations.
Though there are number of states still following the doctrine of absolute state immunity, it is recognised, inter alia, in international treaties. The idea behind this report is to draw attention to the violation of human rights violations in those countries that traditionally represent themselves as developed democracies, to illustrate by concrete facts their failure to. State immunity or how does a victim of a human rights violation claim compensation iv kalogeropoulou and others v. Apart from the conflict between state immunity and human rights protection, the judgment raises further theoretical questions concerning the relationship between international law and national constitutional law, the role of domestic courts in the formation and change of international customary law, as well as the separation of powers in a. This situation results in a clash between human rights and diplomatic immunity.
The impact of human rights law on the traditional concept of diplomatic protection is described. State immunity or how does a victim of a human rights violation claim compensation ii ii. In the ferrini case the italian supreme court affirmed that germany was not entitled to sovereign immunity for serious violations of human rights carried out by. If diplomatic immunity rules constitute jus cogens and human rights rules do not, then diplomatic immunity should prevail. Pdf an emerging exception to foreign state immunity. This articles theory of state remedies for human rights has doctrinal and. This claim to immunity is founded on two interrelated errors. Greece intervening, the international court of justice icj held that italy had failed to respect immunities enjoyed by germany under international law when the italian courts allowed civil actions to be brought against germany for alleged violations of international human rights law ihrl and the law of. In addition, the attorney general and security forces had agreed on a temporary process to remove immunity from security forces and government institutions involved in human right violations. As already stated, state immunity is used to protect one state from. The argument will then proceed to identify five different grounds on which national courts can and must deny immunity to states and officials in both civil and criminal proceedings when the subjectmatter of litigation involves serious violations of human rights andor international crimes.
The connection between state immunity and human rights protection next, the question has to be risen in how far we can connect the principle of state immunity with ideas of human rights. The study concludes that a further restriction of the immunity privilege is necessary, and criteria are offered to distinguish between violations of human rights which should remain immunity protected and violations where the interest of the perpetrating state to remain immune from foreign jurisdiction must yield to the interest of the injured. Different solutions for different types of human rights violations. State immunity act, which grants to heads of states the same privileges and. State immunity and the violation of human rights brill. In the recent times there has been an unfortunate tendency on the part of diplomats to disregard the law of the receiving state and invoke immunity to escape liability leading to the abuse of these privileges. On the other hand, law on state immunity is a wellestablished part of public international law. State immunity and human rights, journal of international. The author explores the current law and practice in respect of state immunity and immunity accorded to state officials with particular regard to civil proceedings for torture, contrasting this. Many human rights advocates and legal scholars view the granting of immunity to a state or its representatives from proceedings arising out of serious human rights violations as artificial, unjust, and. It was not until the mid1970s, with prosecutions of human rights violations in greece and portugal, that the individual.
Today, against a backdrop of multiple conflicts, humanitarian emergencies and severe violations of international. United states department of state bureau of democracy, human rights, and labor violations, leading president lopez obrador to call for talks with union leaders and grupo mexicos ownership to resolve the miners grievances. The impact of current legal developments on corporate. Federal republic of germany, a minority on the hellenic supreme court criticized the theory because of its unproven. Through its declaralab selfevaluation tool, the secretariat provided technical assistance. Bouzari appealed, and the ontario court of appeal confirmed the decision of the trial court. For these reasons, the granting of immunities to the state may lead to impunity from jurisdiction in cases in which certain human rights recognised as peremptory. State sovereignty and human rights irreconcilable tensions. In the ferrini case the italian supreme court affirmed that germany was not entitled to sovereign immunity for serious violations of human rights car. State immunity from jurisdiction and the violation of human. Bibliography and abbreviations books born, gary, international arbitration, cases and materials, new york 2011 born. It is shown that the granting of immunity may contradict the procedural guarantees of the european convention of human rights. The principle of absolute immunity of states from the adjudicatory jurisdiction of foreign states has been replaced by a restrictive. In the ferrini case the italian supreme court affirmed that germany was not entitled to sovereign immunity for serious violations of human rights carried out by german occupying forces during world war ii.
State immunity or how does a victim of a human rights. The idea behind this report is to draw attention to the violation of human rights violations in those countries that traditionally represent themselves as developed democracies. Goettingen journal of international law 4 2012 3, 809852 doi. Request pdf state immunity or state impunity in cases of violations of human rights recognised as jus cogens norms state immunity is an inalienable concept in international law designed to. The study concludes that a further restriction of the immunity privilege is necessary, and criteria are offered to distinguish between violations of human rights which should remain immunityprotected and violations where the interest of the perpetrating state to remain. Head of state immunity in the case of grave violations of human rights. At the same time the law of state immunity, albeit less prominent, has also been subjected to a process of dynamic change. State immunity or state impunity in cases of violations of human. Human rights violations in certain countries in 2012. Incompatibility of the state immunity act with the human rights act and the right to a remedy under international and european law after benkharbouche june 12, 2016. Liability and immunity for human rights violations. State immunity and the violation of human rights jurgen. Human rights violations in the united states a report on u.
Head of state immunity from foreign criminal jurisdiction. One of the undisputed difficulties in the assessment of states entitlement to immunity in the context of human rights violations is the compatibility of the new concepts. Immunity versus human rightsbianchi institute for international law. Jurisdictional immunities of the state for serious violations. Notwithstanding the immediate certainty produced by this judgment, its longevity is potentially challenged by two aspects of contemporary international law. Can serious human rights violations justify a breach of state. On august 16, mara salvatrucha criminal gang members entered one of the largest. Human rights are the bedrock principles which underpin all societies where there is rule of law and democracy.
State practice and the 1961 vienna convention clearly indicate that some immunity provisions are absolute, providing evidence that the rules are, in fact, regarded as jus cogens. Pdf state immunity and human rights is there a future. Since the end of world war ii, the core importance of human rights has been universally acknowledged. However, at the inception of another broad movement to restrict state immunity, now predicated on human rights protection, it is useful to revisit the topic and to attempt to determine which rationale should control. A possible human rights exception could include international crimes and other serious human rights violations. One of the undisputed difficulties in the assessment of states entitlement to immunity in the context of human rights violations is the compatibility of the new concepts with current theoretical assumptions regarding state immunity. Greece and germany, european courts of human rights, admissability decision of december 12, 2002, appl. The majority of, if not all, suits involving allegations of human rights violations have been brought by nationals or residents of the forum state on an assessment that the courts of the state allegedly responsible were unavailable or inadequate. The italian supreme court decision on the ferrini case article pdf available in european journal of international law 161 february 2005 with 123 reads. Head of state immunity in the case of grave violations of.
By establishing head of state immunity as a norm of international customary law part 1. They argue that fundamental human rights such as the right to life and the prohibition against torture should take precedence over rules of state immunity in. Abstract this article suggests that arguments against the availability of state immunity as a bar to civil actions alleging internationally wrongful illtreatment abroad are not only destined to fall by and large on deaf ears but are also misdirected as a matter both of fairness and of the ultimate policy objectives of human rights advocates. The italian supreme court decision on the ferrini case, european journal of international law. State immunity and human rights violations chapter 10 state. State immunity and human rights journal of international criminal. University of leicester school of law research paper no.
Thus, currently customary international law plays the most central role when trying to reconcile head of state immunity and current requirements of international criminal and human rights law. The conflict between state immunity and certain human rights. Corporate social responsibility and the law blog disclaimer foley hoag liability and immunity for human rights violations. State immunity from jurisdiction and the violation of. States cannot be sued for serious human rights violations before the municipal courts of another state. State immunity and human rights journal of international. Hence, victims of human rights violations have sought other ways to obtain redress, in particular by bringing civil claims against the responsible state in the national courts of another state.
Pdf state immunity and human rights is there a future after. Denying foreign official immunity for egregious human rights abuses beth stephens abstract government officials accused of human rights abuses often claim that they are protected by state immunity because only the state can be held responsible for acts committed by its officials. Note that the legitimacy of such assumptions has no bearing on the central thesis of this article, which does not hinge on the existence or nonexistence of jus cogens, but on the fact that state immunity protections for human rights violations are rooted in neither fundamental principles of international law nor international custom. International law in the posthuman rights era texas law. After world war ii, but especially since the 1980s, human rights expanded to almost every corner of international law. Some commentators argue states should not be immune to cases relating to serious human rights abuses.
But under the state accountability model, state of. Italy provides the definitive pronouncement on the relationship between state immunity and alleged human rights violations under general international law. Jun 07, 2017 when human rights are framed as more inviolable than state sovereignty, the human rights regime can claim humanitarian grounds to impinge on state sovereignty and put the states treatment of. Country reports on human rights practices for 2017 united states department of state bureau of democracy, human rights and labor. The italian supreme court decision on the ferrini case 91 instance the princz case. State immunity and human rights state immunity and human rights mcgregor, lorna 20320 00. State immunity and human rights european journal of. The field of international human rights has been one of the most prominent and dynamic areas of public international law in recent decades. And in many cases, a states interest in providing remedies for human rights violations will outweigh the business or foreign relations costs of human rights litigation that are often invoked to deny remedies.
Under the normative hierarchy theory, a states jurisdictional immunity is abrogated when the state violates human rights protections that are considered peremptory international law norms, known as jus cogens. This article explores the courts reasoning and its consistency with international legal theory and preceding case law with the view to verifying whether, and in which sense, the ferrini judgment may facilitate a radical reappraisal of the relationship between human rights and the law of state immunity. European court practice concerning state immunity from enforcement measures 805 a rather peculiar approach is pursued by the 1972 european convention on state immunity,8 which prohibits enforcement measures in general, subject. The basics state immunity grew from the need to protect officials or representatives of foreign states, and for a long time was concerned mainly with the jurisdiction of states over the warships and trading ships belonging to other states. While the ecthr is the only international human rights tribunal to have been seized of the question of the relationship between human rights and state immunity to date, 58 a similar result may emerge from other international human rights bodies with provisions on access to a court or an effective procedural remedy, 59 if presented with such cases. In its recent decision in jurisdictional immunities of the state germany v italy. Human rights violations vs sovereign immunity, comparing national courts of foreign states to the international criminal court. The study concludes that a further restriction of the immunity privilege is necessary, and criteria are offered to distinguish between violations of human rights which should remain immunityprotected and violations where the interest of the perpetrating state to remain immune from foreign jurisdiction must yield to the interest of the injured. See michael bothe, the question of state immunity before nationalcourts in cases of massive violations of human rights and of internationalhumanitarian law 2011 legal opinion written for amnesty international on filewith the author arguing it is shortsighted to argue based on the value orientation ofmodern international law that. State immunity or state impunity in cases of violations of. Dec 01, 2011 the argument will then proceed to identify five different grounds on which national courts can and must deny immunity to states and officials in both civil and criminal proceedings when the subjectmatter of litigation involves serious violations of human rights and or international crimes.
1400 624 871 1154 983 1055 921 598 208 1487 486 91 1319 77 1311 1016 773 173 907 321 878 1550 328 192 44 1450 1437 71 1432 876 914 874 469 1195 452 119